AI curriculum
Deciding when AI belongs in the work
Staff had AI tools before there was an AI policy, in a network where every organization sets its own rules. I designed a use guide for deciding when AI belongs in a task, and a ten-course curriculum that teaches it, from literacy to building agents.
AI Foundations and AI for Impact. United Way Worldwide. Informed by the NIST AI Risk Management Framework and OWASP guidance on AI agent security.
Try it
The use guide
Every task gets two questions: what am I giving the tool, and what happens if the answer is wrong? Sort eight everyday tasks the way the guide would, then check one of your own.
Task 1 of 8
Summarize a published industry report for your team
Choose where the guide would put this task.
Right 0 of 0. Safe tasks blocked 0.
Green. Low risk.
Use it, and still check the result before you share it.
Try it
Would you deploy this agent?
An agent acts on your behalf, so what matters is what it is allowed to do. This one drafts the monthly update to 200 partner organizations and sends it. Set its permissions, run the test, and decide whether it launches.
What the agent is allowed to do
- The job needs this
- The job needs this
Before it launches
Test evidence: not tested yet.
What happened
Run the test to see what this agent does with these permissions.
From the agents module in AI Foundations. Agents need an owner, test evidence and a maintenance plan, and the system enforces their limits.
Course
AI Foundations
The first course in the curriculum, designed for all staff. Non-technical staff learn to decide when AI belongs in a task, including the limits for agents that act on their behalf.
Fig. 4 58 minutes, self-paced, in six modules, plus an optional live clinic.
Six design decisions
- It opens with a piece of real work, not a definition or a product tour.
- Every decision comes back to two questions: what am I giving the tool, and what happens if the answer is wrong.
- Agents get limits the system enforces, not just the wording of a prompt. Learners practice changing one agent permission at a time, and rejecting a hidden instruction inside a document.
- Six skeptic perspectives, including privacy, equity and job security, shaped the activities.
- No AI account is required. A learner can show good judgment by deciding not to use AI.
- One core course, with an adaptation kit each independent organization can choose to use.
Curriculum
AI for Impact
Ten connected courses that move from understanding AI, to applying it in each function, to redesigning whole workflows and building assistants and agents with set limits. Most staff are meant to take two courses; workflow owners and AI champions go further. The function courses cover learning design, communications, research, fundraising and operations, with a course for people who lead teams.
1Understand
- AI Foundations
All staff
2Apply to real work
- AI Learning Design Studio
- AI Communications Studio
- AI Research and Impact Studio
- AI Fundraising Studio
- AI Operations Studio
- Leading Human-Centered AI
Each function; managers add the leadership course
3Redesign the process
- Systems Thinking with AI: redesign the work, not just the task
Workflow owners
4Build
- Build a Useful AI Assistant
- Responsible AI Agents
AI champions
Rules the curriculum holds to
- Completing a course demonstrates learning. It does not grant permission to use a tool, upload information, or launch an assistant or agent.
- Assistants and agents need a named owner, test evidence and a maintenance plan before anyone relies on them.
- In the agents course, permissions are enforced by the system, not just requested in a prompt, and nothing is sent out without human approval.
- Targets are set after measuring a baseline. Time saved on drafting is not reported as organizational savings on its own.