Kyle Branchesi Email

AI in course production

Course production, rebuilt around AI agents

Building a course took 12 weeks and 90 hours of subject experts’ time. I designed and built TRICIA 2.0, a set of topic-specific AI agents that draft the work inside a review process people control.

TRICIA 2.0. United Way Worldwide, 2026. 11 courses. I built the agents, the review gates, the rubrics and the acceptance criteria.

Workflow

How a course moves

Fig. 1 Agents write the drafts. A subject expert reviews each one and can send it back, and Learning checks each course against a rubric. Blue marks where a person decides.

  1. Brief. The course starts from our frameworks, learner personas and design standards.
  2. Agents draft. Topic-specific agents draft the outline, the modules and the job aids.
  3. Expert review. A subject expert reviews every draft and can reject it or send it back.
  4. Learning QA. Each course is checked against a rubric and acceptance criteria before it ships.
  5. Publish. 11 courses were built this way in 2026.

Try it

Review an AI draft

You are the subject expert. An agent drafted this page of a course on sharing data with partners. Mark every line you would not publish, check the source if you need to, then approve the page or send it back.

Agent draft

Module 2. Sharing data with partners

Click a line to mark it. Click again to clear it.

An example page, written for this site. In TRICIA 2.0 a subject expert reviews every draft against its source, and can reject it or send it back. A checkpoint only counts if the reviewer can say no.

Results

12 weeks to 4

Fig. 2 Drawn to scale. Each box is a week; each mark is an hour of a subject expert’s time, per course, across 11 courses in 2026.

Why it works

What made it work

Reviewers can say no

Real review needs knowledge, the source, time and the authority to reject. Both gates can send a draft back, and nothing publishes without them.

The review was redesigned too

Faster drafting is worthless if review becomes the bottleneck, so I redesigned the review along with the drafting: the review gates, quality rubrics, evaluation guidelines and acceptance criteria the experts work from.